

























Ivanti’s VPN slows users, drives up costs, and leaves you exposed to zero-day exploits. Versa ZTNA delivers fast, reliable, and secure per-app access with intelligent traffic route—future-proofed within a unified SASE platform
Direct-to-app connectivity eliminates VPN hairpinning, improving performance, session stability, and mobile user experience.
Per-app access policies reduce attack surface, prevent lateral movement, and eliminate urgent VPN patch cycles.
Integrated ZTNA, SWG, FWaaS, and SD-WAN reduce cost, complexity, and vendor sprawl.
Users or Bandwidth, Cloud vs on-premises, Zero-trust everywhere.
Category | Ivanti Legacy VPN | Zscaler Separate ZIA/ZPA | Versa Unified SASE |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture & Performance | Concentrators collapse throughput, disconnects, zero-day exposure. | Remote only, not seamless for hybrid or on-prem users. | Cloud-native ZTNA with per-app access and smart routing removes bottlenecks and lateral movement. |
Licensing & TCO | Expensive licensing, upsells, patch scramble. | Many SKUs; costs rise at scale. | Flexible licensing by user or bandwidth, side-by-side migration, lower TCO via consolidation. |
Zero Trust & SASE Fit | Patching VPNs does not meet Zero Trust mandates. | Cloud first, weak for hybrid. No native SD-WAN. | Native ZTNA + Unified SASE (ZTNA, SWG, CASB, SD-WAN, FWaaS). |
Operations & Complexity | Single solution to manage. | Complex policy setup, hidden costs, third-party SD-WAN dependency. | Unified platform means fewer vendors, fewer licenses, simpler operations. |
Category |
Ivanti |
Zscaler |
Versa |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture & Performance |
VPN concentrators collapse throughput, trigger disconnects and expose zero-day exploits. |
Remote-only; requires separate ZIA/ZPA. Not seamless for hybrid/on-prem users. |
Cloud-native ZTNA with per-app access and intelligent traffic routing removes bottlenecks and lateral movement risk. |
Licensing & TCO |
Expensive licensing, constant upsells, patch-scramble costs. |
Multiple SKUs (ZIA, ZPA, DLP). Expensive at scale |
Flexible licensing (user or bandwidth), side-by-side migration, lower TCO via vendor consolidation. |
Zero Trust & SASE Fit |
Patching VPNs doesn’t solve concentrator limits or meet Zero Trust mandates. |
Cloud-first; weak for hybrid. No Native SD-WAN. |
Native ZTNA + Unified SASE (ZTNA, SWG, CASB, SD-WAN, FWaaS). |
Operations & Complexity |
Single solution to manage. |
Complex policy setup across ZIA/ZPA; hidden costs as services add up; depends on 3rd-party SD-WAN. |
Unified platform = fewer vendors, fewer licenses, simpler operations. |
Enterprise-grade ZTNA delivering least privilege access, real-time inspection, and global scale. Protect private applications with intelligent Zero Trust, encrypted tunnels, and microsegmentation.
Colt chooses Versa for its “carrier-class, flexible and agile” Secure SD-WAN.
Mirko Voltolini, VP of Technology,Verizon chooses Versa because it “has the built-in services and features [they] need to operate at carrier-grade quality.
Shawn Hakl, Vice President,Orange picks Versa because “it’s an innovative approach in the NFV market” Secure SD-WAN.
Sylvain Desbureaux, Network Expert,ZTNA provides secure, identity-based access to applications without exposing your entire network, unlike VPNs which grant broad access and increase risk.
No. Versa provides a seamless migration plan with minimal downtime, ensuring users continue working without interruptions.
Versa offers unified networking + security, flexible deployment models, and cost-efficient pricing—giving enterprises more control and value than Zscaler.
Yes. Versa’s cloud-native architecture and distributed PoPs ensure low-latency, secure access anywhere in the world.
You’ll see how easy it is to deploy, manage policies, and experience faster, safer access compared to VPN and legacy ZTNA solutions.